BlockDAG's current mainnet roadmap is remarkable for what it still shows.

The page marks several milestones as completed: token generation on February 11, 2026; staking on February 19; initial exchange listings on March 5; and expanded futures trading on March 10.

Then the roadmap changes.

It lists a CEX expansion with a due date of March 20, 2026. It lists DEX launches on Hyperliquid and dYdX for March 24. It lists additional CEX and DEX expansion for March 28 and April 5. It lists a Super Application due April 20.

Those dates are months behind us.

Yet the page still displays them.

This is exactly the kind of evidence investors need to preserve because it allows the public to compare BlockDAG's promised execution schedule with what was actually delivered.

Some milestones may have been completed through different venues or on revised dates. If so, BlockDAG should update the roadmap and show the actual completion date.

But leaving old due dates in place while the project continues issuing new announcements creates confusion that BlockDAG itself can resolve.

Take the March 24 DEX milestone. The roadmap says BlockDAG would go live on two DEX exchanges: Hyperliquid and dYdX.

Did that happen on March 24?

If not, when did it happen?

If the plan changed, why?

The same questions apply to March 20, March 28, April 5 and the April 20 Super Application deadline.

These are not trivial details. Exchange access is how investors obtain liquidity. An application can be part of the utility case used to justify the token's value. When dates attached to those products pass, investors deserve more than silence.

BlockDAG's current technology page also says Phase 1 is completed and describes public mainnet, external nodes and EVM compatibility. Its September 2026 keynote says mainnet, mining, apps and trading are already running.

Fine. Then the roadmap should be easy to reconcile.

Publish what launched, where, and on what date.

Mark canceled milestones as canceled.

Mark changed milestones with the new plan.

Do not leave investors to guess whether an overdue date means failure, delay, replacement or completion.

That matters even more because BlockDAG has continued making newer commitments. The BlockDAG X site showed an August 22 opening date. Buyback dashboards showed an October 1 USDT payment date.

A company cannot keep stacking new deadlines on top of unexplained old ones and expect investors to evaluate each new date as though nothing came before it.

People remember.

And now they have screenshots.

Investors should compare the roadmap with independent evidence from the exchanges themselves. If BlockDAG says a market went live, check the venue. Save the trading pair, launch announcement and first trading date.

Build the chronology together.

BlockDAG has spent years presenting roadmaps as evidence of progress.

Roadmaps work both ways.

They also preserve what the project said it would do.

March and April are over.

BlockDAG should account for every overdue milestone still displayed on its own website before asking investors to place confidence in another deadline.

Investors are not asking for perfection. They are asking for an accurate record. If a March milestone was completed late, mark the actual date. If it was abandoned, say so. If another product replaced it, identify the replacement. That is how a serious project turns a missed roadmap date into accountable project management instead of another unanswered question.

Source Record

• BlockDAG Development Phases
• BlockDAG Mainnet Roadmap
• BlockDAG FAQ
• BlockDAG Dev Release 220 — Awakening Launch Readiness
• BlockDAG 2024 CEO & Team Reveal